4.6 Article

Pituitary macroadenomas with oculomotor cistern extension and tracking: implications for surgical management

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages 315-322

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15107

Keywords

pituitary macroadenoma; oculomotor palsy; oculomotor cistern; endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE Oculomotor cistern extension of pituitary adenomas is an overlooked feature within the literature. In this study, 7 cases of pituitary macroadenoma with oculomotor cistern extension and tracking are highlighted, and the implications of surgical and medical management are discussed. METHODS The records of patients diagnosed with pituitary macroadenomas who underwent resection and in whom preoperative pituitary protocol MRI scans were available for review were retrospectively reviewed. The patient and tumor characteristics were reviewed along with the operative outcomes and complications. RESULTS Seven patients (4.1%) with oculomotor cistern extension and tracking were identified in a cohort of 170 patients with pituitary macroadenoma. The most common presenting symptoms were visual deficit (6 patients; 86%), apoplexy (3 patients; 43%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (3 patients; 43%). Lone oculomotor nerve palsy was seen in 2 patients without apoplexy and 1 patient with an apoplectic event. Gross-total resection was achieved via a microscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach with or without endoscopic aid to the sella in 14%, near-total resection in 29%, and subtotal resection in 57% of patients in the data set. CONCLUSIONS Pituitary adenoma extension along the oculomotor cistern is uncommon; however, preoperatively recognizing such extension should play an important role in the surgeon's operative considerations and postoperative clinical management because this extension can limit gross-total resection using the transsphenoidal approach alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available