4.5 Letter

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation as a part of a sequential multi-phase therapeutic approach (R-COPADM/CYVE/ASCT) as first-line treatment of high-grade B-cell lymphoma: results of a retrospective study with long-term follow-up

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 437-439

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01902-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with high-risk lymphoma received R-COPADM and CYVE treatment, followed by ASCT if suitable. The study showed the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of this regimen, with a 87% overall survival rate and a 83% progression-free survival rate at 46 months of follow-up. These results suggest the potential benefit of this treatment approach for high-risk lymphoma patients.
Patients with high-risk lymphoma have a poor prognosis when treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. This retrospective study included 23 high-risk lymphoma patients with a median age at diagnosis of 59 (range, 35-68) years. They received 2 cycles of R-COPADM and 2 cycles of CYVE, completed by ASCT for fit patients. With a median follow-up of 46 (range, 3-78) months, three (13%) patients in the cohort died. Nearly half of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or 3. Most patients in the cohort (91%, n = 21) had Ann Arbor stage III-IV disease, and 88% (n = 20) had an IPI of 3 to 5. LDH levels were elevated in 83% (n = 19) of patients. Overall, 30% of patients were identified as having double-expressor lymphoma and 22% as having DHL, while two patients (9%) had THL. The origin of the lymphoma was GC B-cell-like in 15 patients (65%) and ABC-like in 8 patients (35%). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 46 months was 14% (95% CI, 5-37), while overall survival was 87% (95% CI, 64-95) and progression-free survival was 83% (95% CI, 60-93). These results showed the efficacy and an acceptable safety profile of the R-COPADM/CYVE/ASCT regimen in high-risk lymphoma, including patients with DHL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available