4.5 Article

Autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 393-400

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01904-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) may be considered as an alternative to reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic HCT (RIC-allo-HCT). A retrospective study compared outcomes of RIC-allo-HCT from matched sibling donors (MSD) or matched unrelated donors (MUD) with auto-HCT for patients aged 55 years or more. While the probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between RIC-allo-HCT and auto-HCT, the risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was higher for both MSD-HCT and MUD-HCT, and for MUD-HCT, the chance of LFS and OS was lower.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is an option for elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively compared results of RIC-allo-HCT from either a matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 209) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 209) with autologous (auto, n = 142) HCT for patients aged 55 years or more treated in first complete remission (CR1) between 2000 and 2018. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years were 34% for RIC-allo-HCT versus 39% for auto-HCT (p = 0.11) while overall survival (OS) rates were 42% versus 45% (p = 0.23), respectively. The incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 41% versus 51% (p = 0.22) and 25% versus 10% (p = 0.001), respectively. In a multivariate model, using auto-HCT as reference, the risk of NRM was increased for MSD-HCT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, p = 0.02) and MUD-HCT (HR = 3.08, p < 0.001), which for MUD-HCT translated into a decreased chance of LFS (HR = 1.55, p = 0.01) and OS (HR = 1.62, p = 0.008). No significant associations were found with respect to the risk of relapse. We conclude that for patients with ALL in CR1, aged above 55 years, auto-HCT may be considered a transplant option alternative to RIC-allo-HCT, although its value requires verification in prospective trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available