Do cage fish farms interfere with the food aspects of the wild species Metynnis lippincottianus (Characiformes, Serrasalmidae)?

We evaluated the differences in the diet and trophic guild of Metynnis lippincottianus under the in-fluence of cage fish farms in the Neotropical reservoir. We collected samples from two areas (cage farm and control) in March and June 2019. Stomach contents were examined, and food items were identified and quantified using the volumetric method. Differences in diet composition were evaluated using PERMANOVA and SIMPER analyses, while trophic niche breadth was determined using PERMDISP. The trophic guild for each area was also determined. Significant differences in diet between cage farm and control areas were observed, due to consumption of pelleted feed, mi-crocrustaceans, Egeria sp., and filamentous algae. In both sampling areas, M. lippincottianus was classified as algivorous. Despite the pelleted feed consumption in the cage farm area, no differen-ces were observed in trophic niche breadth and the trophic guild. In addition, algae and macro-phytes still accounted for the majority of this species' diet in both areas, indicating partitioning of resources. This resource partitioning may favor coexistence, but it is worth mentioning that pelleted feed consumption still indicates the influence of cage fish farms on the diet of wild fish.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the diet and trophic guild differences of Metynnis lippincottianus under the influence of cage fish farms in a Neotropical reservoir. Significant differences in diet composition were observed between the cage farm and control areas, however, there were no differences in trophic niche breadth and the trophic guild. The results suggest that resource partitioning may favor coexistence between the two groups.