4.5 Article

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S)

Journal

BMC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04507-9

Keywords

Coronavirus; COVID-19; Phobia; C19P-S; Validity; Psychometric; Reliability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S) in Iran, showing that it has good psychometric properties and is suitable for assessing panic disorder in therapeutic settings.
Background During various infectious pandemics, phobia or panic has been suggested as one of the most common mental disorders. The current study reports on the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S) in Iran.Methods The forward-backward translation procedure was applied to translate the English version of the C19P-S into Persian. Then, content and face validity, structural validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses), convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity, reliability, and stability were performed to evaluate the Persian version.Results In all, 660 people participated in the study. The mean age of patients was 35.55 (SD = 12.24) years. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a four-factor structure for the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that almost all fitness indices for the model were satisfactory (RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.96, IFI = 0.97). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the questionnaire were 0.95 and 0.96, respectively.Conclusion The Persian version of C19P-S showed good psychometric properties and a good fit for the four-factor structure. It can now be used to assess panic disorder in therapeutic settings and identify candidates needing clinical intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available