4.5 Article

Predictors and tactics for revision surgery in lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06052-8

Keywords

Complication; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Revision; Risk factor; Tactic

Funding

  1. Hebei Medical Science Research Project
  2. Bureau of Science and Technology of Hebei Province [20221185]
  3. [22377708D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to analyze the factors affecting the revision of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and summarize the complications and decision-making strategies for revision surgery after LLIF. The study found that postoperative foraminal stenosis is an important risk factor for undergoing revision surgery after LLIF.
Background: The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the revision of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and to summarize the complications and decision-making strategies for revision surgery after LLIF.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 21 cases suffered from a revision surgery after LLIF in our department from May 2017 to June 2020, with a mean follow-up of 14 months (12-25months). We collected X-ray plain films, CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and medical records of all patients undergoing LLIF surgery, then analyzed the reasons for revision and summarized the revision strategies in different situations. We analysed correlations between revision surgery and several factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, bone quality, mode of internal fixation, spinal stenosis, postperative foraminal stenosis, disc height. Then we brought the different indicators into logistic regression to find out the risk factors of revision after LLIF. All these patients were evaluated by Quality-of-life outcomes. Univariate statistical analysis was performed using T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi square tests.Results: Of the 209 cases of LLIF, 21 patients underwent postoperative revision. All revision surgeries were successfully completed. The reasons for revision included vascular injury, unsatistactory implant placement, internal spinal instrumentation failure, cage migration, indirect decompression failure and infection. Indirect decompression failure was the most common indications for revision. Clinical status was apparently improved in ODI scores and VAS scores. Revision surgery did not impact long-term effect and satisfaction. Postoperative foraminal stenosis is a positive predictor for a revision surgical procedure.Conclusion: Patients with postoperative foraminal stenosis are at higher risk of undergoing revision surgery after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The correct choice of revision surgery can achieve satisfactory clinical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available