4.5 Article

Primary hip and knee arthroplasty at district level is safe and may reduce the burden on tertiary care in a low-income setting

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05936-z

Keywords

Arthroplasty; District hospital arthroplasty; Hip replacement; Knee replacement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes between a District Hospital (DH) and a Tertiary Academic Hospital (TH) in Cape Town, South Africa. The results showed that surgeries performed at the district level had shorter hospital stays, lower readmission rates, lower reoperation rates, and relatively lower mortality rates. Therefore, arthroplasty at the district healthcare level is safe and may help alleviate the pressure on arthroplasty services at tertiary care facilities.
Background Arthroplasty procedures in low-income countries are mostly performed at tertiary centers, with waiting lists exceeding 12 to 24 months. Recently, this is further exacerbated by the impact of the Covid Pandemic on elective surgeries. Providing arthroplasty services at other levels of healthcare aims to offset this burden, however there is a marked paucity of literature regarding surgical outcomes. This study aims to provide evidence on the safety of arthroplasty at district level. Methods Retrospective review of consecutive hip and knee primary arthroplasty cases performed at a District Hospital (DH), and a Tertiary Academic Hospital (TH) in Cape Town, South Africa between 1(st) January 2015 and 31(st) December 2018. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, surgery related readmissions, reoperations, post-operative complications, and mortality rates were compared between cohorts. Results Seven hundred and ninety-five primary arthroplasty surgeries were performed at TH level and 228 at DH level. The average hospital stay was 5.2 +/- 2.0 days at DH level and 7.6 +/- 7.1 days for TH (p < 0.05). Readmissions within 3 months post-surgery of 1.75% (4 patients) for district and 4.40% (35) for tertiary level (p < 0.05). Reoperation rate of 1 in every 100 patients at the DH and 8.3 in every 100 patients at the TH (p < 0.05). Death rate was 0.4% vs 0.6% at district and tertiary hospitals respectively (p > 0.05). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate was 0.43% at DH and 2.26% at TH. The percentage of hip dislocation requiring revision was 0% at district and 0.37% at tertiary level. During the study period, 228 patients received their arthroplasty surgery at the DH; these patients would otherwise have remained on the TH waiting list. Conclusions Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at District health care level is safe and; for the reason that the DH feeds into the TH; providing arthroplasty at district level may help ease the pressure on arthroplasty services at tertiary care facilities in a Southern African context. Adequately trained surgeons should be encouraged to perform these procedures in district hospitals provided there is appropriate patient selection and adherence to strict theatre operating procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available