4.4 Article

Modelling multiple time-scales with flexible parametric survival models

Journal

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01773-9

Keywords

Multiple time-scales; Flexible parametric survival models; Time-varying covariate; Matched cohort; Cohort studies; Epidemiological methods

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institute
  2. Swedish Cancer Society [19 0102]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2019-01965, 2019-00227]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2019-01965] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a method to model multiple time-scales in survival analysis, avoiding data splitting, saving time, and reducing the likelihood of errors.
Background There are situations when we need to model multiple time-scales in survival analysis. A usual approach in this setting would involve fitting Cox or Poisson models to a time-split dataset. However, this leads to large datasets and can be computationally intensive when model fitting, especially if interest lies in displaying how the estimated hazard rate or survival change along multiple time-scales continuously. Methods We propose to use flexible parametric survival models on the log hazard scale as an alternative method when modelling data with multiple time-scales. By choosing one of the time-scales as reference, and rewriting other time-scales as a function of this reference time-scale, users can avoid time-splitting of the data. Result Through case-studies we demonstrate the usefulness of this method and provide examples of graphical representations of estimated hazard rates and survival proportions. The model gives nearly identical results to using a Poisson model, without requiring time-splitting. Conclusion Flexible parametric survival models are a powerful tool for modelling multiple time-scales. This method does not require splitting the data into small time-intervals, and therefore saves time, helps avoid technological limitations and reduces room for error.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available