4.5 Review

Sex Differences in Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling and Functions

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 95, Issue 1-2, Pages 328-335

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23863

Keywords

brain; BDNF; sex; gene expression; signal transduction

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01DK097092, P20GM104934, R21AG050793, R01AG051538]
  2. Presbyterian Health Foundation
  3. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [HR14-117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of the neurotrophin family that plays a critical role in numerous neuronal activities. Recent studies have indicated that some functions or action mechanisms of BDNF vary in a sex-dependent manner. In particular, BDNF content in some brain parts and the tendency to develop BDNF deficiency-related diseases such as depression are greater in female animals. With the support of relevant studies, it has been suggested that sex hormones or steroids can modulate the activities of BDNF, which may account for its functional discrepancy in different sexes. Indeed, the cross-talk between BDNF and sex steroids has been detected for decades, and some sex steroids, such as estrogen, have a positive regulatory effect on BDNF expression and signaling. Thus, the sex of animal models that are used in studying the functions of BDNF is critical. This Mini-Review summarizes our current findings on the differences in expression, signaling, and functions of BDNF between sexes. We also discuss the potential mechanisms for mediating these differential responses, with a specific emphasis on sex steroids. By presenting and discussing these findings, we seek to encourage researchers to take sex influences into consideration when designing experiments, interpreting results, and drawing conclusions. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available