4.5 Article

Effects of Repetitive Low-Pressure Explosive Blast on Primary Neurons and Mixed Cultures

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 94, Issue 9, Pages 827-836

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23786

Keywords

primary blast; mild traumatic brain injury; in vitro model; primary cultures; repetitive blast

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory's Director's Strategic Initiative [DSI-13-WMR-2D-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury represents a considerable health concern, particularly for athletes and military personnel. For blast-induced brain injury, threshold shock-impulse levels required to induce such injuries and cumulative effects with single and/or multiple exposures are not well characterized. Currently, there is no established in vitro experimental model with blast pressure waves generated by live explosives. This study presents results of primary neurons and mixed cultures subjected to our unique in vitro indoor experimental platform that uses real military explosive charges to probe the effects of primary explosive blast at the cellular level. The effects of the blast on membrane permeability, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), uptake of sodium ions, intracellular calcium, and release of glutamate were probed 2 and 24 hr postblast. Significant changes in membrane permeability and sodium uptake among the sham, singleblast-injured, and triple-blast-injured samples were observed. A significant increase in ROS and glutamate release was observed for the triple-blast-injured samples compared with the sham. Changes in intracellular calcium were not significant. These results suggest that blast exposure disrupts the integrity of the plasma membrane, leading to the upset of ion homeostasis, formation of ROS, and glutamate release. Published 2016. dagger This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available