4.4 Article

Right-sided approach to left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava and left bundle branch block: a case report

Journal

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02914-0

Keywords

Left bundle branch area pacing; Conduction system pacing; Pace and ablate; Left bundle branch block

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report describes a right-sided approach for LBBAP via the right subclavian vein. By modifying the delivery sheath manually, adequate lead positioning and minimal torque for LBBAP were achieved.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an alternative to right ventricular (RV) and biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients scheduled for pace and ablate treatment strategy. However, current delivery sheaths are designed for left-sided implantation, making the right-sided LBBAP lead implantation challenging. Case presentation We report a case of a right-sided LBBAP approach via right subclavian vein in a heart failure patient with a persistent left superior vena cava scheduled for pace and ablate treatment of refractory atrial flutter. To enable adequate lead positioning and support for transseptal screwing, the delivery sheath was manually modified with a 90-degree curve at the right subclavian vein and superior vena cava junction to allow right-sided implantation. The distance between the reshaping point and the presumed septal region was estimated by placing the sheath on the body surface under fluoroscopy. With the reshaping of the delivery sheath, we were able to achieve LBBAP with relatively minimal torque. Radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node was performed the next day and the pacing parameters remained stable in short-term follow-up. Conclusion With the modification of currently available tools, LBBAP can be performed with the right-sided approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available