4.7 Article

Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 19, Pages 5353-5361

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0192-16.2016

Keywords

macaque; neuronal correlations; population coding; spatial attention; vision; visual area V4

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Grant [R01EY005911]
  2. National Institutes of Health Fellowship [F32EY02259]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of visual attention in monkeys typically measure neuronal activity when the stimulus event to be detected occurs at a cued location versus when it occurs at an uncued location. But this approach does not address how neuronal activity changes relative to conditions where attention is unconstrained by cueing. Human psychophysical studies have used neutral cueing conditions and found that neutrally cued behavioral performance is generally intermediate to that of cued and uncued conditions (Posner et al., 1978; Mangun and Hillyard, 1990; Montagna et al., 2009). To determine whether the neuronal correlates of visual attention during neutral cueing are similarly intermediate, we trained macaque monkeys to detect changes in stimulus orientation that were more likely to occur at one location (cued) than another (uncued), or were equally likely to occur at either stimulus location (neutral). Consistent with human studies, performance was best when the location was cued, intermediate when both locations were neutrally cued, and worst when the location was uncued. Neuronal modulations in visual area V4 were also graded as a function of cue validity and behavioral performance. By recording from both hemispheres simultaneously, we investigated the possibility of switching attention between stimulus locations during neutral cueing. The results failed to support a unitary spotlight of attention. Overall, our findings indicate that attention-related changes in V4 are graded to accommodate task demands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available