4.7 Article

Cleansing data from an electronic feeding station to improve estimation of feed efficiency

Journal

BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages 361-369

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.11.004

Keywords

Porcine livestock; Feeding behavior; Data filtering; Fattening pigs

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [RTC-2017-5977-2]
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used various methods to cleanse the data from an electronic feeding station on a commercial farm, and identified and categorized typical errors through detailed analysis of the mass curves of each animal. Feed efficiency was calculated after filtering the raw data, resulting in improved estimation of feeding efficiencies for individual animals.
Electronic feeding stations (EFS) are frequently used to automatically record feeding behaviour in pigs, but the resulting data often require cleansing. In this study, several filters were used to cleanse the data from an EFS on a commercial farm, spanning a period of 2147 days (2,709,600 records or visits, corresponding to 2748 pigs). The raw data of each animal was filtered based on three main parameters: fattening duration, feed ingested and live mass. Anomalies that affected EFS readings included aspects related to animal handling (e.g., changes of pen, deaths; affecting 26.1%), maintenance failures (e.g., obstructions, feed mass calibration; affecting 4.4%) and malfunctioning of the animal weighing scale (e.g., calibration, anomalies in the load cell; affecting 10.6%). A detailed analysis of the mass curves of each animal helped identify and categorise three typical errors: 1) large fluctua-tions of animal mass over a short period of time (affecting 7.3%); 2) poor calibration of the animal weighing scale (affecting 3.3%); and 3) absence of data from the weighing scale (affecting 1.9%). Once the raw data were filtered, feed efficiency was calculated, resulting in a mean value of 0.434, which is consistent with the literature. After filtering the first dataset, another dataset was used from the same farm to validate the results, with similar findings. Overall, the filtering methodology used helped to automate data analysis from EFS and improved the estimation of feeding efficiencies for individual animals.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IAgrE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available