4.8 Article

Evaluating the role of algae in algal-bacterial granular sludge: Nutrient removal, microbial community and granular characteristics

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 365, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128165

Keywords

Algae -bacteria interaction; Nitrogen removal; Denitrifying bacteria; Extracellular polymeric substances

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Ministry of Housing and Urban -Rural Development of China
  3. [51778082]
  4. [K 2021-k-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the role of algae in treating synthetic municipal wastewater. The results showed that algae significantly improved the removal efficiency of total nitrogen. Algae increased the relative abundance of denitrifying bacteria and enhanced the NH3-N removal capacity in the anaerobic stage.
Algal-bacterial granular sludge (ABGS) and bacterial granular sludge (BGS, control group) were operated over 240 days to investigate the role of algae in treating synthetic municipal wastewater. The results showed that algae significantly improved the removal efficiency of total nitrogen (TN). The nitrogen removal load of ABGS was 2.6 mg-N/g-VSS/day (22.8 %, light) and 1.1 mg-N/g-VSS/day (9.6 %, dark) higher than that of BGS, respectively, which was attributed to algae enhanced NH3-N removal capacity in the anaerobic stage and increased the utilization efficiency of organics in denitrification. Algae increased the relative abundance of denitrifying bacteria, and ABGS (28.83 %) was higher than BGS (14.28 %). Moreover, the dominant phylum of algae was Chlorophyta (98.39 %), the chlorophyll-a was sustained at 1.28 +/- 0.26 mg/g-VSS. Algae significantly increased the content of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and the increased polysaccharide came from the tightly bound EPS. This study expands the understanding of the role of algae in ABGS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available