4.5 Article

Assessment of models for calculating the hydrodynamic radius of intrinsically disordered proteins

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages 310-321

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.12.013

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion measurements by pulsed-field gradient NMR and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy can be used to probe the hydrodynamic radius of proteins. To tackle the accuracy uncertainty issue in computing the hydrodynamic radius from atomic coordinates, conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins were built and compared with measurements of compaction. The Kirkwood-Riseman equation was found to provide the best description of the hydrodynamic radius probed by pulsed-field gradient NMR ex-periments.
Diffusion measurements by pulsed-field gradient NMR and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy can be used to probe the hydrodynamic radius of proteins, which contains information about the overall dimension of a protein in solution. The comparison of this value with structural models of intrinsically disordered proteins is nonetheless impaired by the uncertainty of the accuracy of the methods for computing the hydrodynamic radius from atomic coordinates. To tackle this issue, we here build conformational ensembles of 11 intrinsically disordered proteins that we ensure are in agreement with measurements of compaction by small-angle x-ray scattering. We then use these ensembles to identify the forward model that more closely fits the radii derived from pulsed-field gradient NMR diffusion experiments. Of the models we examined, we find that the Kirkwood-Riseman equation provides the best description of the hydrodynamic radius probed by pulsed-field gradient NMR ex-periments. While some minor discrepancies remain, our results enable better use of measurements of the hydrodynamic radius in integrative modeling and for force field benchmarking and parameterization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available