4.5 Article

Induced asymmetries in membranes

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 122, Issue 11, Pages 2092-2098

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.12.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The plasma membrane of eukaryotes exhibits lipid asymmetry, with different lipids primarily located in different leaflets. Using computational simulations, it has been found that saturation asymmetry arises as a result of phospholipid number asymmetry and sphingomyelin contents. This suggests that some asymmetries in lipid composition may naturally result from others and do not require external factors. The asymmetry of cholesterol, on the other hand, is fairly mild and influenced by all the other asymmetries.
Lipid asymmetry in plasma membrane of eukaryotes is ubiquitous. The first measurements reported compositional asymmetry: phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine are mostly on the cytoplasmic leafet, while phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin are mostly on the exoplasmic leaflet. More recent experiments using lipidomics have evidenced the presence of saturation asymmetry between the two leaflets. A question that naturally arises is why such an asymmetry? To complicate matters, it is still largely unknown in which leaflet cholesterol lies. Here, we use chemical potentials to mimic flippase proteins responsible for maintenance of compositional asymmetry in silico. We show that saturation asymmetry naturally arises as a byproduct of phospholipid number asymmetry and sphingomyelin contents, thereby showing that some reported asymmetries may naturally result from others and do not necessarily require being externally driven. We also show that plasmalogen lipids' tendency to be highly unsaturated is also natural. Additionally, we tackle the problem of cholesterol and show that, while it is influenced by all asymmetries, the resulting cholesterol asymmetry tends to be fairly mild.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available