4.5 Article

Identification of potent and selective inhibitors of PKR via virtual screening and traditional design

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2022.129047

Keywords

PKR inhibitor; Kinase; Selectivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PKR inhibition is important in immunology and neuroscience. However, existing compounds lack selectivity. This study used virtual screening and compound design to identify more selective leads for investigating PKR biology.
Protein Kinase RNA-activated (PKR) inhibition is thought to be relevant for immunology due to the potential to reduce macrophage and dendritic cell responses to bacteria and its signaling downstream of TNF alpha. PKR is also associated with neuroscience indications such as Alzheimer's disease due to its activation by the double stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus HSV1, a virus suggested to be important in the development of AD. Studies exploring the mechanistic role of PKR with existing tool molecules such as the tricyclic oxindole C16 are clouded by the poor selectivity profile of this ATP-competitive, Type I kinase inhibitor. Type II kinase leads such as the benzothio-phene or pyrazolopyrimidine scaffolds from literature are equally poor in their selectivity profiles. As such, it became necessary to identify more potent and selective chemical matter to better understand PKR biology. A dual approach was taken. The first step of the strategy included virtual screening of the AbbVie compound collection. A combination of pharmacophore-based and GPU shape-based screening was pursued to identify selective chemical matter from promiscuous leads. The second step of the strategy followed traditional compound design. This step initiated from a literature lead with PKR cross reactivity. Combined, the two parallel efforts led to identification of more selective leads for investigation of PKR biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available