4.4 Review

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic herb-drug interactions of common over-the-counter pain medications

Journal

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5591

Keywords

biomedical chromatography; biomedical separation; herb-drug interactions; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review compiles and analyzes original articles on understanding possible herb-drug interactions between traditional herbs and four major pain medications-acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen. The most common analytical method used is high-performance liquid chromatography with an isocratic eluent system coupled to biological sample clean-up, and a wide variety of detectors have been observed. Synergistic and anti-synergistic effects were observed for acetaminophen and aspirin, while only synergistic effects have been found for naproxen. Currently, no interactions have been reported for ibuprofen.
Pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical intervention, and self-medication with over-the-counter medications and/or traditional herbal remedies has become increasingly popular. In this review, original articles on understanding possible herb-drug interactions between traditional herbs and four major pain medications-acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen and naproxen-are compiled and analyzed. In terms of analytical methods, high-performance liquid chromatography using an isocratic eluent system coupled to biological sample clean-up is the most common, while a wide variety of detectors have been observed, including a photodiode array, variable wavelength detector, electrochemical detector and tandem mass spectrometer. Both synergistic and anti-synergistic effects were observed for acetaminophen and aspirin, while only synergistic effects have been found for naproxen. Currently, no interactions have been reported for ibuprofen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available