4.7 Article

CFD modelling of spatiotemporal evolution of detailed tar species in a downdraft gasifier

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106656

Keywords

Bioenergy; Gasification; Tar kinetics; Downdraft gasifier; CFD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel study that investigates the formation and evolution of tar species in biomass gasification using a two-dimensional numerical model. The model is validated using experimental and kinetic data and demonstrates the ability to simulate producer gas production. Benzene, naphthalene, toluene, and phenol are identified as the main tar species, with benzene having the highest concentration.
The rising demand for renewable energy around the world has sparked interest in biomass gasification. However, the technology greatly suffers because of tar species produced during the gasification process, which limits direct use of the produced gas. To address this issue, the paper presents a novel piece of work that focuses on the formation and evolution of tar species consisting of benzene, naphthalene, toluene, and phenol. A twodimensional numerical model for a downdraft biomass gasifier is developed with a total of 20 thermochemical kinetic reactions to investigate the formation of tar species in the gasifier with the effect of residence time. The model's predictions are validated with the experimental and kinetic data and found to be in good agreement. Besides, the model's ability to simulate the producer gas production from a downdraft gasifier is examined. Reaction rates for volatiles decomposition, combustion, and gasification reactions under different working conditions are investigated. Overall, benzene has the highest concentration of the selected tar species, followed by naphthalene, and with relatively modest amounts of phenol and toluene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available