4.7 Article

Facially Amphiphilic Skeleton-Derived Antibacterial Cationic Dendrimers

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 269-282

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01128

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cationic dendrimers derived from facially amphiphilic skeletons show high antibacterial activity and biocompatibility, and are more effective and safer than penicillin G in treating infections and promoting wound healing.
It is urgent to develop biocompatible and high-efficiency antimicrobial agents since microbial infections have always posed serious challenges to human health. Herein, through the marriage of facially amphiphilic skeletons and cationic dendrimers, high-density positively charged dendrimers D-CA6-N+ (G2) and D-CA2-N+ (G1) were designed and synthesized using the branch of facially amphiphilic bile acids, followed by their modification with quaternary ammonium charges. Both dendrimers could self assemble into nanostructured micelles in aqueous solution. D-CA6-N+ displays potent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) as low as 7.50 and 7.79 mu M, respectively, and has an evidently stronger antibacterial activity than D-CA2-N+. Moreover, D-CA6-N+ can kill S. aureus faster than E. coli. The facial amphiphilicity of the bile acid skeleton facilitates the selective destruction of bacterial membranes and endows dendrimers with negligible hemolysis and cytotoxicity even under a high concentration of 16x MIC. In vivo studies show that D-CA6-N+ is much more effective and safer than penicillin G in treating S. aureus infection and promoting wound healing, which suggests facially amphiphilic skeleton-derived cationic dendrimers can be a promising approach to effectively enhance antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of antibacterial agent, simultaneously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available