4.7 Article

Deterministic dynamic Stackelberg games: Time-consistent open-loop solution

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110757

Keywords

Time inconsistency; Stackelberg game; Linear-quadratic problem

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper revisits the known deterministic linear-quadratic Stackelberg game and addresses the time inconsistency issue in the open-loop Stackelberg solution. A two-tier game framework is introduced, where the upper-tier game follows Stackelberg's scenario between a leader and a follower, and the outcomes of two lower-tier intertemporal games represent the follower's and the leader's response controls. The obtained open-loop equilibrium of this two-tier game is weakly time-consistent and the conditions for its existence and uniqueness are characterized using Riccati-like equations.
In this paper, the known deterministic linear-quadratic Stackelberg game is revisited, whose open-loop Stackelberg solution actually possesses the nature of time inconsistency. To handle this time inconsistency, a two-tier game framework is introduced: the upper-tier game works according to Stackelberg's scenario between a leader and a follower, and the outcomes of two lower-tier intertemporal games characterize, respectively, the follower's and the leader's response controls that mimic the notion of time-consistent open-loop equilibrium control in existing literature. The obtained open-loop equilibrium of this two-tier game is shown to be weakly time-consistent in the sense that the adopted policies will no longer be denied in the future only if past policies are consistent with the equilibrium policies. On the existence and uniqueness of such a solution, necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained, which are characterized via the solutions of several Riccati-like equations. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available