4.7 Article

How the Human Brain Represents Perceived Dangerousness or Predacity of Animals

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 19, Pages 5373-5384

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3395-15.2016

Keywords

categories; fMRI; MVPA; representation similarity analysis; STATIS; vision

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Mental Health [F32MH085433-01A1, 5R01MH075706]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF1129764]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common or folk knowledge about animals is dominated by three dimensions: (1) level of cognitive complexity or animacy; (2) dangerousness or predacity; and (3) size. We investigated the neural basis of the perceived dangerousness or aggressiveness of animals, which we refer to more generally as perception of threat. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we analyzed neural activity evoked by viewing images of animal categories that spanned the dissociable semantic dimensions of threat and taxonomic class. The results reveal a distributed network for perception of threat extending along the right superior temporal sulcus. We compared neural representational spaces with target representational spaces based on behavioral judgments and a computational model of early vision and found a processing pathway in which perceived threat emerges as a dominant dimension: whereas visual features predominate in early visual cortex and taxonomy in lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortices, these dimensions fall away progressively from posterior to anterior temporal cortices, leaving threat as the dominant explanatory variable. Our results suggest that the perception of threat in the human brain is associated with neural structures that underlie perception and cognition of social actions and intentions, suggesting a broader role for these regions than has been thought previously, one that includes the perception of potential threat from agents independent of their biological class.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available