4.7 Review

Summary and derived Risk Assessment of 3D printing emission studies

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119501

Keywords

3D printing; Indoor air quality; Volatile organic compounds; Ultrafine particles; Nano particles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review of 50 studies on 3D printing with the material extrusion method summarizes that higher printing temperature leads to higher emissions, styrene is the main volatile organic compound emitted during ABS printing, released particles are in the nano range, and filaments with additives could pose health risks. In vivo and in vitro studies show toxic effects. Therefore, it is recommended to print in a well-ventilated area, use the lowest possible print temperature, and be cautious with filaments containing particulate additives.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing process that increases in application and consumer popularity. Studies with 3D printers have shown that the printing process releases particles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This review looked at 50 studies that analyzed the most commonly used printing process in consumer 3D printers, the material extrusion or so-called fused filament fabrication (FFF) method and summarizes the most important results. Although the reviewed studies often used different methods, general assumptions can be drawn: Higher printing temperature resulted in higher emissions, styrene was the main VOC emitted during printing with ABS, the size of released particles was in the nano range and filaments with additives could pose a higher risk due to the possible release of e.g., carbon nanotubes (CNTs). In vivo and in vitro studies showed toxic effects. Thus, we recommend: printing in a separated and ventilated room, using the lowest possible print temperature and be cautious with filaments containing particulate additives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available