4.7 Article

The Thermonuclear X-Ray Bursts of 4U 1730-22

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 940, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b26

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA through the Astrophysics Data Analysis Program [80NSSC20K0288]
  2. NASA through CRESST II [80GSFC21M0002]
  3. Proyecto de Investigacion Plurianual (PIP) (Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, CONICET) [0113]
  4. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, ANPCyT [PICT-2017-2865]
  5. Royal Society
  6. CNES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents observations of the historic transient 4U 1730-22 using NICER. The X-ray binary, which had been in quiescence since its discovery in 1972, showed renewed outburst activity in 2021 and 2022. The observations detected a total of 17 thermonuclear X-ray bursts, which were divided into bright and weak bursts based on their characteristics. The study provides insights into the source distance and suggests explanations for the observed phenomena.
We present observations of the historic transient 4U 1730-22 as observed with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER). After remaining in quiescence since its 1972 discovery, this X-ray binary showed renewed outburst activity in 2021 and 2022. We observed 4U 173-22 extensively with NICER, detecting a total of 17 thermonuclear X-ray bursts. From a spectroscopic analysis, we find that these X-ray bursts can be divided into a group of bright and weak bursts. All bright bursts showed 1-2 s rise times and a photospheric radius expansion phase, while the weak bursts showed a slower similar to 5 s rise with a tendency for concave shapes. From the photospheric radius expansion flux, we estimate the source distance at 6.9 +/- 0.2 kpc. We consider various interpretations for our observations and suggest that they may be explained if accreted material is burning stably at the stellar equator and unstable ignition occurs at a range of higher latitudes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available