4.7 Article

Neural Variability Quenching Predicts Individual Perceptual Abilities

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 97-109

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1671-16.2016

Keywords

EEG; trial by trial neural variability; variability quenching; visual perception

Categories

Funding

  1. Israeli Science Foundation [961/14]
  2. German Israeli Foundation
  3. Berger Family
  4. I-CORE Israeli Science Foundation program [51/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neural activity during repeated presentations of a sensory stimulus exhibits considerable trial-by-trial variability. Previous studies have reported that trial-by-trial neural variability is reduced (quenched) by the presentation of a stimulus. However, the functional significance and behavioral relevance of variability quenching and the potential physiological mechanisms that may drive it have been studied only rarely. Here, we recorded neural activity with EEG as subjects performed a two-interval forced-choice contrast discrimination task. Trial-by-trial neural variability was quenched by similar to 40% after the presentation of the stimulus relative to the variability apparent before stimulus presentation, yet there were large differences in the magnitude of variability quenching across subjects. Individual magnitudes of quenching predicted individual discrimination capabilities such that subjects who exhibited larger quenching had smaller contrast discrimination thresholds and steeper psychometric function slopes. Furthermore, the magnitude of variability quenching was strongly correlated with a reduction in broadband EEG power after stimulus presentation. Our results suggest that neural variability quenching is achieved by reducing the amplitude of broadband neural oscillations after sensory input, which yields relatively more reproducible cortical activity across trials and enables superior perceptual abilities in individuals who quench more.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available