4.3 Article

Perovskite catalysts for oxidative coupling of methane improved by Y-doping

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/apj.2863

Keywords

catalysts; OCM performance; perovskite; Y-doping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, four perovskite catalysts were prepared and tested for their catalytic performance in the oxidative coupling of methane. The results showed that Ce-based catalysts exhibited higher catalytic performance compared to Zr-based catalysts, and the addition of Y element significantly improved the selectivity of ethylene. By observing the active oxygen species and basic sites on different catalysts, BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-delta was found to have the best performance.
Oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) is an effective route for methane direct conversion to ethylene. Perovskite oxides (ABO(3)) with variable properties are potential catalysts for OCM by adjusting the compositions. In this study, four perovskite catalysts, BaMO3-delta and BaM1-xYxO3-delta (M = Zr, Ce; x = 0.2), were prepared by the sol-gel method to explore their catalytic performance of OCM. All catalysts are active toward OCM and reach the highest catalytic performance at 800 degrees C. The OCM performance of Ce-based catalysts is higher than that of Zr-based catalysts. The selectivity of C-2 compounds is significantly improved by Y-doping. At CH4/O-2 mol ratio of 8, a C-2 selectivity of 67% was achieved on BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-delta. Compared with Zr-based catalysts, more amounts of active oxygen species, which are beneficial to OCM, were observed on BaCeO3-delta and BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-delta. Meanwhile, higher contents of moderate and strong basic sites, which are beneficial to OCM, were found on the Y-doped catalysts. This is attributed to the generation of oxygen vacancies caused by Y-doping in the B-site. Therefore, BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-delta with more active oxygen species and stronger basicity exhibits the highest performance among the four catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available