4.6 Article

Greedy opposition-based learning for chimp optimization algorithm

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
Volume 56, Issue 8, Pages 7633-7663

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10343-w

Keywords

Metaheuristics; Chimp optimization algorithm; Opposition-based learning; Greedy search

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a modified Chimp Optimization Algorithm (ChOA) that improves the exploration and exploitation capabilities of the original algorithm. The performance of the modified algorithm, called OBLChOA, is evaluated on various benchmark functions, IEEE CEC06-2019 tests, random landscapes, and real-world engineering challenges. The results show that OBLChOA and CMA-ES perform the best among the tested algorithms in terms of mathematical test functions and engineering challenges.
The chimp optimization algorithm (ChOA) is a hunting-based model and can be utilized as a set of optimization rules to tackle optimization problems. Although ChOA has shown promising results on optimization functions, it suffers from a slow convergence rate and low exploration capability. Therefore, in this paper, a modified ChOA is proposed to improve the exploration and exploitation capabilities of the ChOA. This improvement is performed using greedy search and opposition-based learning (OBL), respectively. In order to investigate the efficiency of the OBLChOA, the OBLChOA's performance is evaluated by twenty-three standard benchmark functions, ten suit tests of IEEE CEC06-2019, randomly generated landscape, and twelve real-world Constrained Optimization Problems (IEEE COPs-2020) from a variety of engineering fields, including industrial chemical producer, power system, process design and synthesis, mechanical design, power-electronic, and livestock feed ration. The results are compared to benchmark optimizers, including CMA-ES and SHADE as high-performance optimizers and winners of IEEE CEC competition; standard ChOA; OBL-GWO, OBL-SSA, and OBL-CSA as the best benchmark OBL-based algorithms. OBLChOA and CMA-ES rank first and second among twenty-seven numerical test functions, respectively, with forty and eleven best results. In the 100-digit challenge, jDE100 achieves the highest score of 100, followed by DISHchain1e + 12, and OBLChOA achieves the fourth-highest score of 93. In total, eighteen state-of-the-art algorithms achieved the highest score in seven out of ten issues. Finally, OBLChOA and CMA-ES achieve the best performance in five and four real-world engineering challenges, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available