4.6 Article

Alternative Structure Models of the Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Needs Survey: A Veterans Affairs TBI Model Systems Study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 104, Issue 7, Pages 1062-1071

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.01.004

Keywords

Brain Injuries; Traumatic; Health services needs and demand; Mil-itary personnel; Rehabilitation; Surveys and questionnaires; Veterans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the factor structure of the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS) by conducting a secondary analysis of an observational cohort study on individuals who were 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). The results showed that the RNS factor structure could be explained by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and a 2-factor solution with satisfactory internal consistency was chosen as the most concise and clinically applicable model. Additionally, the RNS structure corresponded with elements of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) conceptual framework.
Objective: To explore the factor structure of the Rehabilitation Needs Survey (RNS). Design: Secondary analysis of observational cohort study who were 5-years post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Five Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. Participants: Veterans enrolled in the TBI Model Systems longitudinal study who completed the RNS at 5-year follow-up (N=378). Main Outcome Measure(s): RNS. Results: RNS factor structure was examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with oblique rotation. Analyses returned 2-and 3-factor solutions with Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.715 to 0.905 and corrected item-total correlations that ranged from 0.279 to 0.732. The 2-factor solution accounted for 61.7% of the variance with >3 exclusively loading items on each factor with acceptable internal consistency metrics and was selected as the most parsimonious and clinically applicable model. Ad hoc analysis found the RNS structure per the EFA corresponded with elements of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) conceptual framework. All factors had adequate internal consistency (a>0.70) and 20 of the 21 demonstrated good discrimination (corrected item-total correlations>0.40). Conclusions: The 2-factor solution of the RNS appears to be a useful model for enhancing its clinical interpretability. Although there were cross loading items, they refer to complex rehabilitation needs that are likely influenced by multiple factors. Alternatively, there are items that may require alteration and redundant items that should be considered for elimination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:1062-71 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available