4.6 Article

A Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Discharged to Inpatient Rehabilitation vs a Skilled Nursing Facility: The Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 605-611

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.11.008

Keywords

Acute; Ischemic stroke; Skilled nursing facilities; Stroke; Stroke rehabilitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the factors associated with discharge of acute ischemic stroke survivors to inpatient rehabilitation (IRF) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) rehabilitation services. The results showed that patients discharged to SNF had longer hospital stays, more comorbidities, and higher modified Rankin scores compared to patients discharged to IRF. Nine characteristics were associated with a decreased likelihood of being discharged to IRF, while four characteristics were associated with an increased likelihood of being discharged to IRF. The study findings highlight the differences in demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics between AIS patients receiving rehabilitation services in IRF and SNF.
Objective: To compare the sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital related factors associated with discharge of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) survi-vors to inpatient rehabilitation (IRF) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) rehabilitation services. Design: Retrospective descriptive study from the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP) participating hospitals during 2016 to 2019. Setting: 9 Participating states from PCNASP in United States. Participants: 130,988 patients with AIS from 569 hospitals (N=337,857). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Discharge to IRF and SNF. Results: Patients discharged to a SNF had longer length of hospital stay, more comorbidities, and higher modified Rankin scores compared with patients discharged to an IRF. Nine characteristics were associated with being less likely to be discharged to an IRF than an SNF: older age (85+ years old, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.20 [confidence interval [CI]=0.18-0.21]), identifying as non-Hispanic Black (AOR=0.85 [CI=0.81-0.89]), identifying as Hispanic (AOR=0.80 [CI=0.74-0.87]), having Medicaid or Medicare (AOR=0.73 [CI=0.70-0.77]), being able to ambulate with assistance from another person (AOR=0.93 [CI=0.89-0.97]), being unable to ambulate (AOR=0.73 [CI=0.62-0.87]) and having comorbidities, prior stroke (AOR=0.69 [CI=0.66-0.73]), diabetes (AOR=0.85 [CI=0.82-0.88]), and myocardial infraction or coronary artery disease (AOR=0.94 [CI=0.90-0.97]). Four characteristics were associated with being more likely to be discharged to an IRF than an SNF: being a man (AOR=1.20 [CI=1.16-1.24]), and having a slight disability (Rankin Score 2) (AOR=1.41 [CI=1.29-1.54]), being at larger hospitals (200-399 beds: AOR=1.31 [CI=1.23-1.40]; 400+ beds: AOR=1.29 [CI=1.20-1.38]), and being at a hospital with stroke unit (AOR=1.12 [CI=1.07-1.17]). Conclusion: This study found differences in demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics of AIS patients discharged for rehabilitation to an IRF vs SNF. The characteristics of patients receiving rehabilitation services may be helpful for researchers and hospitals making policies related to stroke discharge and practices that optimize patient outcomes. Populations experiencing inequities in access to rehabilitation services should be identified, and those who qualify for rehabilitation in IRF should receive this care in preference to rehabilitation in SNF. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:605-11

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available