4.5 Article

Exploring gaps and opportunities in primary care following an asthma hospital admission: a multisite mixed-methods study of three data sources

Journal

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 385-391

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324114

Keywords

qualitative research; primary health care; child health services; child health; respiratory medicine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the gaps and opportunities in primary care for children following a hospital admission for asthma. It emphasizes the need for improved preventative patterns of primary care visits, timely communication between hospitals and primary care providers, and guideline concordant care by GPs.
ObjectiveExplore gaps and opportunities in primary care for children following a hospital admission for asthma. DesignExploratory mixed-methods, using linked hospital and primary care administration data. SettingEligible children, aged 3-18 years, admitted to one of three hospitals in Victoria, Australia between 2017 and 2018 with a clinical diagnosis of asthma. Results767 caregivers of eligible children participated, 39 caregivers completed a semistructured interview and 277 general practitioners (GPs) caring for 360 children completed a survey. Over 90% (n=706) of caregivers reported their child had a regular GP. However, few (14.1%, n=108) attended a GP in the 24 hours prior to index admission or in the 7 days after (35.8%, n=275). Children readmitted for asthma (34.2%, n=263), compared with those not readmitted (65.8%, n=504), were less likely to have visited a GP in the non-acute phase of their asthma in the 12 months after index admission (22.1% vs 42.1%, respectively), and their GP was more likely to report not knowing the child had an asthma admission (52.8% vs 39.2%, respectively). Fewer GPs reported being extremely confident managing children with poorly controlled asthma (11.9%, n=43) or post-discharge (16.7%, n=60), compared with children with well-controlled asthma (36.4%, n=131), with no difference by child readmission status. ConclusionsGiven the exploratory design and descriptive approach, it is unknown if the differences by child readmission status have any causal relationship with readmission. Nonetheless, improving preventative patterns of primary care visits, timely communication between hospitals and primary care providers, and guideline concordant care by GPs are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available