4.7 Article

Comparing and optimizing the potential advantages of a salinity-gradient solar pond for either absorption-based or ejector-based refrigeration cycles combined with thermoelectric generators

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119539

Keywords

Salinity -gradient solar pond; Absorption refrigeration cycle; Ejector refrigeration cycle; Thermoelectric generator; Multi -objective optimization; Comparative study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the applicability of two popular refrigeration cycles for air-conditioning, i.e., absorption-based and ejector-based, combined with a salinity-gradient solar pond. The study conducted energy, exergy, economic, and environmental investigations, as well as multi-objective optimization, to evaluate the performance of the two models. The results showed that using a zeotropic mixture in the absorption cycle improved its efficiency, while the ejector cycle was found to be the most suitable for the solar pond.
This study compares the applicability of two popular refrigeration cycles for air-conditioning, i.e., absorption -based (Model 1) and ejector-based (Model 2), combined with a salinity-gradient solar pond. Indeed, there ex-ists a gap in comparing the performance of solar pond-based refrigeration cycles to which this study intends to respond. In addition, utilizing zeotropic mixtures in an ejector refrigeration cycle integrated with a solar pond and selecting the most suitable zeotropic for such a framework has not been regarded in the literature. Both models are boosted using thermoelectric generators for low-temperature waste heat recovery and electricity generation. Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental investigations with a net present value analysis are implemented, and multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II is conducted. As another principal point, this paper performs a case study to illustrate the performance of models regarding an actual climate condition. Results show that using Butane-R143a zeotropic increases the advantages of Model 1; however, Model 2 is the most suitable selection for the solar pond. According to the optimum state, Model 1 possesses exergy efficiency and Levelized cost of products of 17.93% and 0.12 $/kWh, which are 0.84 percentage points and 83% better than Model 2. But Model 2 has a better environmental performance by mitigating 22% further carbon dioxide than Model 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available