4.4 Article

Response properties of MST parafoveal neurons during smooth pursuit adaptation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 210-217

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00203.2016

Keywords

cerebral cortex; eye movements; plasticity; rhesus macaque; visual response

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY-019266, EY-06069, P30 EY-001730]
  2. ORIP [P51 OD-010425]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visual motion neurons in the posterior parietal cortex play a critical role in the guidance of smooth pursuit eye movements. Initial pursuit (open-loop period) is driven. in part, by visual motion signals from cortical areas, such as the medial superior temporal area (MST). The purpose of this study was to determine whether adaptation of initial pursuit gain arises because of altered visual sensitivity of neurons at the cortical level. It is well known that the visual motion response in MST is suppressed after exposure to a large-field visual motion stimulus. showing visual motion adaptation. One hypothesis is that foveal motion responses in MST are associated with smooth pursuit adaptation using a small target spot. We used a step-ramp tracking task with two steps of target velocity (double-step paradigm), which induces gain-down or gain-up adaptation. We found that after gain-down adaptation 58% of our MST visual neurons showed a significant decrease in firing rate. This was the case even though visual motion input (before the pursuit onset) from target motion was constant. Therefore, repetitive visual stimulation during the gain-down paradigm could lead to adaptive changes in the visual response. However, the time course of adaptation did not show a correlation between the visual response and pursuit behavior. These results indicate that the visual response in MST may not directly contribute to the adaptive change in pursuit initiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available