4.7 Article

Rice husk-derived carbon materials for aqueous Zn-ion hybrid supercapacitors

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 608, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155215

Keywords

Rice husk -derived carbon; Molten salt carbonization; Zinc -ion hybrid supercapacitors; Synergistic effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-performance rice husk-derived carbonaceous electrode materials were prepared for aqueous zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitors through a simplistically one-step molten salt carbonization process. The electrode materials exhibited excellent rate performance, energy density, power density, and cyclic stability, which depended on the synergistic effect of the porous structure, specific surface area, electrical conductivity, and heteroatom doping.
High-performance rice husk-derived carbonaceous electrode materials for aqueous zinc-ion hybrid super -capacitors (ZHSCs) were prepared via a simplistically one-step molten salt carbonization process in molten eutectic Na2CO3-K2CO3 at 750, 850 and 950 degrees C. ZHSC assembled by Zn foil as an anode and carbon material prepared at 850 degrees C as a cathode delivers 149.8, 120.1, 108.7, 100.3, 89.3, 80.7 and 69.8F g-1 from 0.2 to 20 A g-1 in 3 mol L-1 Zn(CF3SO3)2 aqueous solution with a rate performance of 47 % capacitance retention. It exhibited energy (power) density with 58.6 Wh kg- 1 (167.8 W kg -1) at 0.2 A g-1 and power (energy) density with 10.0 kW kg- 1 (9.7 Wh kg -1) at 20 A g-1 as well as excellent cyclic stability with 95.8 % capacitance retention and coulombic efficiency of 99.9 % after 3005 charge-discharge cycles at 2 A g-1. The relationship between structure and electrochemical energy storage performance is also discussed with performance depending on the synergistic effect of porous structure, specific surface area, electrical conductivity and het-eroatom doping of rice husk-derived carbon materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available