4.7 Article

A tag-and-count approach for quantifying surface silanol densities on fused silica based on atomic layer deposition and high-sensitivity low-energy ion scattering

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 607, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154551

Keywords

Fused silica; Silanol; LEIS; ALD; XPS; Tag-and-count

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a tag-and-count approach for determining surface silanol densities on glass surfaces. The method involves tagging surface silanols with zinc via atomic layer deposition (ALD) and detecting the zinc using high sensitivity-low energy ion scattering (HS-LEIS). Experimental results are consistent with literature values.
Surface silanols (SiOH) are important moieties on glass surfaces. Here we present a tag-and-count approach for determining surface silanol densities, which consists of tagging surface silanols with Zn via atomic layer depo-sition (ALD) followed by detection of the zinc by high sensitivity-low energy ion scattering (HS-LEIS). Shards of fused silica were hydroxylated with aqueous hydrofluoric acid (HF) and then heated to 200, 500, 700, or 900 degrees C. These heat treatments increasingly condense and remove surface silanols. The samples then underwent one ALD cycle with dimethylzinc (DMZ) or diethylzinc (DEZ) followed by water. As expected, fused silica surfaces heated to higher temperatures showed lower Zn coverages. When fused silica surfaces treated at 200 degrees C were exposed to DMZ for two different dose times, the same sub-monolayer quantity of Zn was obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Surface cleaning/preparation immediately before HS-LEIS, including atomic oxygen treat-ment and annealing, played a critical role in these efforts. Surfaces treated with DMZ generally showed slightly higher Zn signals by LEIS. Using this methodology, a value of 4.59 OH/nm2 was found for fully hydroxylated fused silica. Both this result and those obtained at 500, 700, and 900 degrees C are in very good agreement with literature values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available