4.8 Article

Praseodymium doping in ceria-supported palladium nanocatalysts as an effective strategy to minimize the inhibiting effects of water during methane oxidation

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121898

Keywords

Catalytic methane oxidation; Palladium; ceria-praseodymia catalysts; Doped ceria; Hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity; Water inhibition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an improved design for Pd/Ce-Pr catalysts, showing that the PdO-PrOx interaction in materials with high praseodymium content results in lower activity, while a limited amount of Pr in ceria can lead to a more active catalyst. The simultaneous presence of Pd in its reduced and oxidized forms is a key factor for high activity, and the higher hydrophobicity of the sample significantly reduces the H2O inhibition effect typical of Pd-based materials.
The present study reports an improved design for Pd/Ce-Pr catalysts. Pd-impregnated nanostructured ceria-praseodymia catalysts with different compositions were comprehensively characterized and tested for dry and wet methane oxidation. The strong PdO-PrOx interaction, detected via XRD, TPR/TPO, Raman and HRTEM analyses, retains Pd mainly in its oxidized form in the materials with high praseodymium content, thus resulting in a lower activity. Conversely, the introduction of a limited amount of Pr in ceria allows to obtain a more active catalyst (2% of Pd supported on a mixed oxide with 10% of Pr) than the typical Pd/CeO2 systems. Hence, the simultaneous presence of Pd in its reduced and oxidized forms results to be a key factor for high activity. Additionally, the higher hydrophobicity of this sample, investigated through NMR and in situ FTIR, markedly reduces the H2O inhibition effect typical of Pd-based materials, paving the way for using this system in real applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available