4.8 Article

Ternary MnCoVOx catalysts with remarkable deNOx performance: Dual acid-redox sites control strategy

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 318, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121779

Keywords

Air pollution control; Denitration; Ammonia selective catalytic reduction; Dual active sites tuning strategy; Ternary MnCoVOx catalysts

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Devel- opment Program of China [2016YFC0205900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976078, 21773016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20202ACB213001, NELMS2019A12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study designs a series of ternary metal oxide catalysts with outstanding denitration performance through a dual acid-redox sites tuning strategy and achieves efficient conversion of NOx and sulfur resistance over a wide temperature range.
How to widen the active temperature window of metal oxide catalysts for abatement of NOx is urgent for their real application. Herein, a series of ternary MnCoVOx metal oxide catalysts with outstanding denitration peRformance were designed via a simple dual acid-redox sites tuning strategy, which is to inhibit the redox ability properly and enhance the acidity to make the catalyst exerts the optimum. The Mn0.50Co0.49V0.01Ox catalyst after vanadium tuning exhibited superior catalytic performance, achieving > 80% NOx conversion over a wide temperature window (162 -508 ?) under the humid reaction condition, the selectivity of N2 > 85% up to 510 ?, and also displayed enhanced SO2 tolerance. Compared with the commercial Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst, the ternary MnCoVOx catalysts showed comparable activity but better sulfur resistance. Thereby, the easy -synthesized and low-cost ternary metal oxides based on the dinuclear active sites tuning strategy pave a way for designing superior denitration catalysts for practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available