4.7 Article

Sound absorption performance of a micro perforated sandwich panel with honeycomb-hierarchical pore structure core

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109200

Keywords

Hierarchical pore; Sound absorption; Sandwich panel

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new micro perforated sandwich panel with honeycomb-hierarchical pore structure core is developed in this study. By combining carbonized cotton with hierarchical pore structure and a micro perforated honeycomb core, the sound-absorbing performance of the structure is enhanced without significant weight increase. Experimental results show that the average sound absorption coefficient of the structure can be improved from 0.220 to 0.558 with pure carbonized cotton filling, and further increased to 0.626 with hierarchical pore structure. Additionally, theoretical and finite element models are established with prediction errors of 16.8% and 8.6% respectively.
A new micro perforated sandwich panel with honeycomb-hierarchical pore structure core is designed and prepared in this study. Carbonized cotton with hierarchical pore structure is combined with a micro perforated honeycomb core sandwich panel, which enhances the sound-absorbing performance of the structure without significantly increasing its weight. The experiment showed that pure carbonized cotton filling can improve the average sound absorption coefficient (at 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) of the structure from 0.220 to 0.558, and hierarchical pore structure can further improve the average sound absorption coefficient to 0.626. Meanwhile, appropriate theoretical and finite element models are established, with 16.8 % and 8.6 % error respectively based on the predicted average sound absorption coefficient relative to experimental results.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available