4.7 Article

Perceptual differences in automotive acceleration sounds between drivers and passengers

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 201, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109092

Keywords

Acceleration sound; Perception; Sound quality; Annoyance; Sportiness; Acceleration feeling; Preference

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the perceptual differences in the acceleration sound of a passenger car during rapid acceleration between drivers and passengers. Experimental results demonstrated a significant perceptual difference between drivers and passengers.
In this study, we investigated the perceptual differences in the acceleration sound of a passenger car dur-ing rapid acceleration between drivers and passengers. Previous studies have addressed the perceptual differences in acceleration sounds according to nationality, driving situation, and the taste and past expe-riences of customers. It is expected that a perceptual difference will occur between the driver and pas-sengers. However, perceptual differences between drivers and passengers have not yet been reported. Laboratory experiments were conducted to address this unclear issue. A subjective evaluation of affective attributes for acceleration sounds, such as annoyance, sportiness, acceleration feeling, and preference in driver and passenger situations, was carried out by employing a multimodal simulator. Participants were allowed to perform non-driving-related activities in the passenger role, whereas they were induced to concentrate only on the driving situation in the driver role. Experimental results have shown that there is a significant perceptual difference between drivers and passengers. It was found that the acceleration sound level for passengers should be reduced compared to the driver's seat to improve the passenger's auditory satisfaction.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available