4.3 Article

Associations of the Oxford Knee Score and knee arthroplasty revision at long-term follow-up

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Orthopedics

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Are Minimum Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Necessary for Accurate Assessment of Patient Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Abhijit Seetharam et al.

Summary: This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after 1093 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The study compared PROMs related to pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction at different follow-up intervals (preoperatively, 4 months, 1 year, and minimum 2 years) using paired data analysis techniques.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2022)

Review Orthopedics

Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Mei Lin Tay et al.

Summary: This study found that the most common failure modes for medial UKAs were aseptic loosening and OA progression. Early failures were often caused by infection, bearing dislocation, and fracture; mid-term failures were mainly due to OA progression, aseptic loosening, and pain; while late-term failures were primarily due to OA progression. Rates of failure varied depending on implant design and cement use, highlighting the importance of careful consideration of these factors in UKA procedures.

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2022)

Article Orthopedics

The lifetime risk of revision following total knee arthroplasty

B. Stone et al.

Summary: The study aimed to assess the lifetime risk of revision for patients in different age categories at the time of undergoing primary TKA. It found that young male patients (age 46-50) had the highest lifetime risk of revision. The overall ten year survival rate was 95.6%, increasing with age.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty

Shiraz A. Sabah et al.

Summary: This study estimated the clinically meaningful changes and differences for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS) using distribution and anchor-based methods. The estimates can be used for sample size calculations and interpreting changes in joint function and differences between groups.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Article Orthopedics

The lifetime revision risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

M. L. Tay et al.

Summary: This study compares the revision risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and calculates the 'lifetime risk' of UKA revision. The results show that the lifetime risk of UKA revision is higher than TKA in younger patients, females, and those with a higher ASA grade.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2022)

Review Orthopedics

Meaningful Clinical Applications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics

Eric C. Makhni

Summary: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable data for patient-centered health outcome assessment and shared decision-making in clinical care. They play a critical role in monitoring clinical situations, understanding surgical responses, and can also be utilized for clinical research and predictive analytics.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Patient-reported Outcome Measurement for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stephen Lyman et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS (2017)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice

Robert Trevethan

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH (2017)

Article Orthopedics

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees

Chuan Kong Koh et al.

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2017)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

David J. Beard et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Article Orthopedics

Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in US Total Joint Replacement Registries: Rationale, Status, and Plans

Patricia D. Franklin et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare

Nick Black

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

Article Orthopedics

The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement

P. N. Baker et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME (2012)

Article Orthopedics

An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry

A. G. Rothwell et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings

Jill Dawson et al.

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)

Article Rheumatology

Perception of Improvement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Varies With Disease Activity Levels at Baseline

D. Aletaha et al.

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2009)

Review Rheumatology

Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review

AM Garratt et al.

RHEUMATOLOGY (2004)