4.5 Article

Background matching explains repeatable individual variation in the defence strategies of a stick insect

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 185-192

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.10.003

Keywords

adaptive coloration; animal personality; camouflage; crypsis; deimatism; individuality; masquerade; risk taking

Funding

  1. Forrest Research Foundation postdoctoral fellowship
  2. UWA Faculty of Science Rising Stars' award [68000003]
  3. UWA Fellowship Support Grant [12104502]
  4. ARC Future Fellowship [FT180100491]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT180100491] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates whether individual behavior is dependent on perceived vulnerability using the crowned stick insect as a model. The research finds consistent behavioral differences among individuals, with risk-prone individuals exhibiting more defensive displays. Furthermore, a strong positive correlation is observed between defensive behaviors and reflectance relative to the background, indicating a functional link between behavioral variation and perceived vulnerability.
Visually matching the background environment is an important means by which many animals avoid predation. Yet natural habitats are rarely uniform over space and time. A key question is whether prey behaviour depends on an individual's perceived vulnerability. Using the crowned stick insect, Onchestus rentzi, as a model, we asked whether individuals' willingness to take risks, and their decision to react or to remain motionless when facing a predator threat, is explained by their appearance matching the background and/or variation in their life history traits. Over 4 consecutive weeks, we assayed individuals' tendencies to take risks and exhibit defensive displays in response to predation risk. We also measured individuals' body reflectance relative to their background (i.e. contrast) and traits related to life history that might influence risk-taking behaviours, including reproductive traits in both males and females. Individuals differed consistently from each other in their behaviour over time, with risk-prone in-dividuals engaging more in defensive displays than risk-averse animals. Although we found no effects of body reflectance per se on individual variation in behaviour, we observed a strong positive correlation between defensive behaviours and reflectance relative to the background (i.e. contrast), revealing a functional link between behavioural variation and perceived vulnerability that is independent of life history traits.(c) 2022 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available