4.8 Article

Poly-Hydride [AuI7(PPh3)7H5](SbF6)2 cluster complex: Structure, Transformation, and Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Properties

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 62, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202300553

Keywords

CO2RR; Dehydrogenation; Electrocatalytic; Hydride Gold(I) Complex; Nanocluster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the synthesis and characterization of a gold cluster complex [Au-7(PPh3)(7)H-5](SbF6)(2), which decomposed to [Au-8(PPh3)(7)](2+) upon exposure to light, were reported. The valence state of Au-I and H- was verified through various experimental techniques. These two nanoclusters exhibited different selectivities in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), with Au7H52+ showing 98.2% selectivity for H2 and Au-8(2+) showing 73.5% selectivity for CO. Further calculations showed that the H- ligand inhibited the CO2RR process compared to the electron-donor H.
Hydride Au-I bonds are labile due to the mismatch in electric potential of an oxidizing metal and reducing ligand, and therefore the structure and structure-activity relationships of nanoclusters that contain them are seldom studied. Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of [Au-7(PPh3)(7)H-5](SbF6)(2) (abbrev. Au7H52+), an Au cluster complex containing five hydride ligands, which decomposed to give [Au-8(PPh3)(7)](2+) (abbrev. Au-8(2+)) upon exposure to light (300 to 450 nm). The valence state of Au-I and H- was verified by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, NMR, UV/Vis and XPS. The two nanoclusters behaved differently in the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR): Au7H52+ exhibited 98.2 % selectivity for H-2, whereas Au-8(2+) was selective for CO (73.5 %). Further DFT calculations showed that the H- ligand inhibited the CO2RR process compared with the electron-donor H.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available