4.7 Article

Thalamic interictal epileptiform discharges in deep brain stimulated epilepsy patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 263, Issue 10, Pages 2120-2126

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8246-5

Keywords

Anterior nucleus of the thalamus; Dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus; Refractory epilepsy; Deep brain stimulation; Interictal epileptiform discharges

Funding

  1. University Clinic for Neurology, Magdeburg
  2. von Bodelschwingh Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationships between interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in the anterior (ANT) and dorsomedial nuclei (DMNT) of the thalamus and electro-clinical parameters in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy patients receiving intrathalamic electrodes for deep brain stimulation (DBS) were investigated. Thalamus-localized IEDs (LIEDs) and surface EEG (sEEG)-IEDs were evaluated in eight patients who underwent ANT-DBS. Occurrence and frequency of ANT- and DMNT-LIEDs and pre-operative sEEG-IEDs were examined with respect to seizure onset location and seizure outcome following ANT-DBS. LIEDs were identified in all eight patients, in the ANT, DMNT, or both. ANT-LIEDs were observed in all patients with an unequivocal temporal seizure onset zone. The ANT-LIED frequency correlated with pre-surgical sEEG-IED frequency (rho = 0.76, p = 0.033) and predicted ANT-DBS responsiveness (T = -2.6; p = 0.0428). Of the five patients with bilateral sEEG-IEDs, all had ANT-LIEDs, but only one patient had DMNT-LIEDs. All patients with no or unilateral sEEG-IEDs had DMNT-LIEDs. Observation of LIEDS in the ANT and DMNT supports the hypothesis that these nuclei are involved in propagation of focal epileptic activity. Their correspondence with differing electro-clinical features suggests that these nuclei are functionally distinguishable nodes within the epileptic networks of individual patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available