4.7 Article

Rituximab in the treatment of Neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre Italian observational study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 263, Issue 9, Pages 1727-1735

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8188-y

Keywords

Devic's syndrome; Neuromyelitis optica; Rituximab; Dosing regimen

Funding

  1. Serono Foundation
  2. University of Catania
  3. MIUR
  4. FISM
  5. Merck Serono
  6. Sanofi-Avemtis
  7. Biogen
  8. Merck-Serono
  9. Novartis
  10. Roche
  11. Almirall
  12. Bayer Schering
  13. Biogen Idec
  14. Genzyme
  15. GW Pharmaceuticals
  16. Sanofi-Aventis
  17. Teva
  18. Bayer
  19. Novartis e Teva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rituximab (RTX) efficacy in NMO is suggested by several case series. No consensus exists on optimal dosing strategies. At present the treatment schedules more frequently used are 375 mg/m2/week iv for 4 weeks (RTX-A) and 1000 mg iv twice, 2 weeks apart (RTX-B). Aim of this study is to confirm RTX efficacy and safety in the treatment of NMO and to evaluate whether a most favourable dosage regimen exists. Data on RTX-treated NMO patients were collected from 13 Italian Hospitals. 73 patients (64 F), were enlisted. RTX-A was administered in 42/73 patients, RTX-B in 31/73. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 7-106). Mean relapse rate in the previous year before RTX start was 2.2 +/- 1.3 for RTX-A and 2.3 +/- 1.2 for RTX-B. ARR in the first year of treatment was 0.8 +/- 0.9 for RTX-A and 0.2 +/- 0.4 for RTX-B, in the second year of treatment was 0.9 +/- 1.5 for RTX-A and 0.4 +/- 0.8 for RTX-B patients (p = 0.001 for the first year, ns (0.09) for the second year). RTX-B was more effective in delaying the occurrence of a relapse (HR 2.2 (95 % IC 1.08-4.53) p = 0.02). Adverse events were described in 19/73 patients (mainly urinary tract and respiratory infections, and infusion reactions). Two deaths were reported in severely disabled patients. Though with the limitations of an observational study, our data support RTX efficacy in NMO and suggest that high dose pulses might be more effective than a more fractioned dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available