4.8 Article

Electrokinetic Extraction of Doxorubicin from Biological Fluids by Polymer Inclusion Membrane Sampling Probe

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02937

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) based sampling probe was developed for efficient electrokinetic extraction of drugs from biological fluids. The probe was fabricated by dipcoating a nonconductive glass capillary tube in a homogeneous solution consisting of cellulose triacetate (CTA), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE), and 1-ethyl-3methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide [EMIM][NTf2]. The developed technique demonstrated practicality and reliability in extracting doxorubicin from various biological samples, with a quantification limit of 0.2-2 ng/mL.
A polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) based sampling probe was developed for electrokinetic extraction of drugs from biological fluids. The probe was fabricated by dipcoating a nonconductive glass capillary tube in a homogeneous PIM solution for three cycles. The PIM solution comprised cellulose triacetate (CTA), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE), and 1-ethyl-3methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide [EMIM][NTf2] in a ratio of 5:4:2. The developed probe electrokinetically extracted doxorubicin from human plasma, human serum, and dried blood spot (DBS). The practicability and reliability of the electrokinetic extraction were evaluated by LC-MS/MS to quantify the desorption of extracted doxorubicin. Under the optimized conditions, a quantification limit of 0.2-2 ng/mL was achieved for the three biological samples. The probe was further integrated into a portable battery-powered device for safe low-voltage (36 V) electrokinetic extraction. The developed technique is envisioned to provide a more efficient analytical workflow in the laboratory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available