4.5 Article

An integrated fluorescent lateral flow assay for multiplex point-of-care detection of four respiratory viruses

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 659, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114948

Keywords

Quantum dot nanobeads; Multiplex detection; Lateral flow assay; Respiratory viruses

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [81902159]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study established a portable quantum dot nanobeads-based lateral flow assay with high sensitivity and specificity for multiplex detection of four respiratory virus markers. The method showed good repeatability and detection specificity, and it has the potential for rapid and multiplex detection of respiratory viruses in resource-limited settings.
This work established a highly sensitive and specific quantum dot nanobeads-based lateral flow assay for multiplex detection of four respiratory virus markers at point of care. The respiratory virus antigens were detected by fluorescent lateral flow strips within 20 min. The limits of detection for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, IAV antigen, IBV antigen, and ADV antigen were 0.01 ng/mL, 0.05 ng/mL, 0.31 ng/mL, and 0.40 ng/mL, respec-tively, which were superior to that of conventional AuNPs-based colorimetric lateral flow assay. The coefficients of variation of the test strip were 6.09%, 2.24%, 7.92%, and 12.43% for these four antigens, which indicated that the proposed method had good repeatability. The specificity of the detection system was verified by different combinations of these four respiratory viruses and several other respiratory pathogens. These results indicated that this method could simultaneously detect SARS-CoV-2, IAV, IBV and ADV in a short assay time, showing the remarkable potential for the rapid and multiplex detection of respiratory viruses in resource-limited settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available