Journal
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1238, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340656
Keywords
LC-QTOF-MS-SWATH; Accurate mass spectrum; Comprehensive screening analysis; Automated identification and quantification
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study has developed an automated identification and quantification system for toxic chemicals, which is highly efficient, low-cost, labor-saving, and environmentally friendly. It uses a novel acquisition method to obtain accurate mass spectrometry data with minimal interference from co-eluted peaks. Collaborative tests demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the system, meeting the standards for analytical method validity.
In order to protect human health and the environment, highly efficient, low-cost, labor-saving, and green analysis of toxic chemicals are urgently required. To achieve this objective, we have developed a novel database -based automated identification and quantification system (AIQS) using LC-QTOF-MS. Since the AIQS uses retention times (RTs), exact MS and MS-MS spectra, and calibration curves of 484 chemicals registered in the database instead of the use of standards, the targets can be determined with low-cost in a short time. The AIQS uses Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment-ion Spectra as an acquisition method by which we can obtain accurate MS and MS-MS spectra of all detectable substances in a sample with minimal interference from co-eluted peaks. Identification is certainly done using RTs, mass error, ion ratios (a precursor to two product ions), and accurate MS and MS-MS spectra. Consequently, the chance of misidentification is very low even in dirty samples. To examine the accuracy of the AIQS, two collaborative tests were conducted. The first test used 208 pesticide standards at two concentrations (10 and 100 ng mL-1) using 7 instruments, and showed that average trueness was 106 and 95.2%, respectively, with relative standard deviations of 90% of the test com-pounds below 30%. The second collaborative study involved 5 laboratories carrying out recovery tests on 200 pesticides using 10 river waters. The average recovery was 71.6%; this was 15% lower than that using purified water probably due to the matrix effects. The average relative standard deviation was 30% worse than that of measurement of the standards. Both the recovery and reproducibility, however, satisfied the criteria of Analytical Method Validity Guidelines, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Instrument detection limits of 96% of the registered compounds are below 10 pg. The AIQS allows for easy addition of new substances and retro-spective analysis after their addition. The results applied to actual samples showed that the AIQS has sufficient identification and quantification performance as a target screening method for a large number of substances in environmental samples.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available