4.7 Article

Neurosarcoidosis: a clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 264, Issue 5, Pages 1023-1028

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8336-4

Keywords

Sarcoidosis; Neurosarcoidosis; Diagnosis; Treatment; Management

Funding

  1. MRC [MR/K004166/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K004166/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2014-25-006] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcoidosis is a rare but important cause of neurological morbidity, and neurological symptoms often herald the diagnosis. Our understanding of neurosarcoidosis has evolved from early descriptions of a uveoparotid fever to include presentations involving every part of the neural axis. The diagnosis should be suspected in patients with sarcoidosis who develop new neurological symptoms, those presenting with syndromes highly suggestive of neurosarcoidosis, or neuro-inflammatory disease where more common causes have been excluded. Investigation should look for evidence of neuro-inflammation, best achieved by contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Evidence of sarcoidosis outside the nervous system should be sought in search of tissue for biopsy. Skin lesions should be identified and biopsies taken. Chest radiography including high-resolution computed tomography is often informative. In difficult cases, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gallium-67 imaging may identify subclinical disease and a target for biopsy. Symptomatic patients should be treated with corticosteroids, and if clinically indicated other immunosuppressants such as hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide or methotrexate should be added. Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapies may be considered in refractory disease but caution should be exercised as there is evidence to suggest they may unmask disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available