4.6 Article

Rational design of a turn-on near-infrared fluorescence probe for the highly sensitive and selective monitoring of carboxylesterase 2 in living systems

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 148, Issue 4, Pages 876-887

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2an01874h

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vivo selective fluorescence imaging of carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) is challenging due to potential interference from other hydrolases and limitations of existing fluorescence probes. Here, a novel NIR fluorescent probe was developed based on CES2's substrate preference and catalytic performance. This probe exhibited a notable red-shift in the fluorescence spectrum upon hydrolysis by CES2, enabling imaging of CES2 activities in cancer cells.
In vivo selective fluorescence imaging of carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) remains a great challenge because existing fluorescence probes can potentially suffer from interference by other hydrolases. In addition, some fluorescent probes that have been separately reported for measuring CES2 activity in vitro are affected by autofluorescence and absorption of the biological matrix due to their limited emission wavelength or short Stokes shift. Herein, based on the substrate preference and catalytic performance of CES2, a novel and NIR fluorescent probe was developed, in which a hemi-cyanine dye ester derivative was used as the basic fluorescent group. In the presence of CES2, the probe was hydrolyzed to expose the fluorophore CZX-OH (lambda(abs) similar to 675 nm, lambda(em) & SIM; 850 nm), which led to a notable red-shift in the fluorescence (similar to 175 nm) spectrum. Confocal imaging of cells and live mice demonstrated that the fluorescent signal of this probe was related to the real activities of CES2 in cancer cells. All these results will powerfully promote the screening of CES2 regulators and the analysis of CES2-related physiological and pathological processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available