4.4 Review

The impact of gendered experiences on female medical students' specialty choice: A systematic review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 225, Issue 1, Pages 33-39

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.023

Keywords

Medical students; Specialty choice; Gender

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the social factors that affect the specialty choice of female medical students. The results indicate that gender discrimination, socialization, lifestyle considerations, negative perceptions of male-dominated specialties, and lack of female role models contribute to gender segregation within medical specialties. Female medical students tend to concentrate in specialties such as family medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology.
Background: Women make up 50% of American medical school graduates, yet are not equally represented in the vast spectrum of medical specialties. Many fields within medicine remain male dominated. This systematic review will explore social factors that affect female medical students' specialty choice. Hypothesis: Gendered experiences influence the specialty choice of female medical students, resulting in their concentration in a specific cohort of specialties. Methods: Studies were gathered by searching MEDLINE/Pubmed and EBSCOhost for sociological factors that impact female medical students' specialty choice. Results: 34 articles were selected for this systematic review. Factors that contribute to gender segregation within medical specialties include gender discrimination, socialization, lifestyle considerations, negative perceptions of male-dominated medical specialties and lack of female role models. Conclusion: This systematic review supported the hypothesis that gendered experiences impact women's medical specialty choice, and thus result in their concentration in specialties such as family medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available