4.4 Article

Advanced endoscopic resections in the treatment of malignant colorectal lesions: Are early oncological outcomes impacted?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 225, Issue 3, Pages 537-540

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.024

Keywords

Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Malignant polyps; Early colorectal carcinoma; Early colorectal carcinoma management; Perforation; Cancer recurrence

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective chart review was conducted to explore the impact of advanced endoscopic resections on early oncological outcomes of malignant colorectal lesions. The study found that even in the presence of perforation, advanced endoscopic procedures did not have a negative impact on the early oncological outcomes of these patients.
Background: Limited data exists on the impact of advanced endoscopic resections on early oncological outcomes of malignant colorectal lesions, especially in the presence of perforation. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent advanced endoscopic resections and had adenocarcinoma was performed. The primary endpoint was cancer recurrence. Results: 63 patients were included. Mean age was 64.6 years with 58.7% of the patients being male. Mean BMI was 30.2 kg/m(2) 12 patients underwent advanced endoscopic resections followed by surveillance, 5 patients had conversion to surgery due to intra-procedural perforation, and 5 patients due to incomplete resection. 41 patients underwent salvage surgery following a median of 5.4 weeks of initial endoscopic resection. Neither local nor distant recurrence was observed within a median follow-up of 21.2 months. Conclusion: Advanced endoscopic procedures do not have negative impact on the early oncological outcomes of patients with malignant colorectal lesions, even in the presence of perforation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available